Broadcasters
Measurable broadcast, headend to egress
In classic broadcast the argument is rarely technical — it is about liability. We turn measurement into evidence.
Sound familiar?
The blame conversation never ends
Headend, distributor and platform point at each other. Without measurement both sides accept, it never closes.
Transport is a blind spot
OTT-focused tools don't see UDP/SRT. TS-level problems surface only once they reach the viewer.
No recording after an incident
An outage happened, everyone has a theory, but there is no footage or measurement from that moment.
Satellite and IP together, monitoring apart
Hybrid delivery means a separate tool and screen per path, and no single view of health.
What UnifyCast does about it
Complete TR 101 290 analysis
Priority 1, 2 and 3 broken out individually: PCR accuracy and repetition, PAT/PMT, continuity, scrambling state, ECM/EMM.
Transport quality indicators
MDI (DF/MLR), inter-arrival time and jitter — separating network-induced damage from encoder-induced.
Recording and incident replay
Footage around an alarm is retained so you can review the event and argue root cause with evidence.
UDP, SRT, HLS and DASH in one engine
Whichever path it takes: same panel, same alarm vocabulary, same report.
SLA and KPI reporting
Uptime, error rates and incident durations, delivered to management as a scheduled email report.
Frequently asked
- We already use TSDuck and FFmpeg — what's different?
- Both are excellent, and UnifyCast uses them internally. The difference is being a system that runs continuously: thresholds, hysteresis, alarm routing, history and reporting are not what command-line tools provide.
- Our organisation does not allow outbound data.
- That is the architecture already. Probes and server run inside your infrastructure; no internet connection is required.
- Will it integrate with our existing NOC?
- Alarms can be delivered over email, webhook, Slack, Telegram, SNMP trap and PagerDuty, so they land in your current process.